Ho

Wednesday, October 1, 2008

Mediation and Mediators - Some Common Myths Debunked

A few years ago, a national conflict resolution association conducted an informal, for-fun survey on the streets of Washington, DC. They asked passersby to identify the definition of mediation from a multiple-choice list. The good news tax attorney that the majority of people correctly chose, a way to resolve conflict. The bad news is that mortgage refinance interest rates than a few people incorrectly chose, a relaxation method, (meditation) a way to communicate with the dead, (via a medium, I suppose) when the media exploits the private lives up public figures, and worst of all, the wall that separates each side of the highway" (median).

Obviously, the mediation profession has some educational work to do. One way this comes home to me regularly is through the mediation myths I hear repeatedly. The following are the most common myths I run across and I hope to set the record straight for me and my fellow mediatorsuh, mediumsuh, medians

Myth: Mediators determine who is right or whose case is strongest.

Reality: Mediators do not act in a judge-like capacity and do not decide whos right or wrong. Mediators are content neutral and do not take sides. We help participants consider ways to resolve the dispute by facilitating negotiation and helping the conversation unfold differently than it may have in the past.

Myth: Going to mediation means I have to compromise, so Ill have to give up something or settle for less than I want.

Reality: While compromise is one possible outcome of mediation, never assume it is the automatic result. A skilled mediator helps participants explore creative, win-win options that may have been invisible prior to the mediated conversation, leading to results that are often more satisfying than simplistic compromise.

Myth: The mediator needs expertise in the content area of my dispute.

Reality: A skilled mediator does not need expertise in the content of the dispute, whether its real estate, marriage, information technology, education or another arena. Our expertise is in dispute resolution. It is not part of the mediators job to make suggestions to solve the dispute; instead, we approach the conflict conversation in ways that help options surface and be explored more creatively. Too much mediator familiarity with the content area of your dispute can actually be detrimental, since the certainty this breeds can inadvertently get in the mediatorsand yourway. Your intimate knowledge of your own dispute is far more than the mediator can ever have, so you are in a better position, given the right tools and opportunity, to imagine and endowments selling your own resolution.

Myth: Mediation will make me give away my case.

Reality: While most mediations don't involve a legal case, those that do often have attorneys present for the session. In those instances, it's not uncommon for attorneys to voice this concern. What attorneys and their clients often discover in my mediations, though, is that the drive to make a strong legal case can inadvertently put up barriers to the parties resolving the matter themselves if they were permitted to share ideas and information with one another. Mediation is far more effective if participants are open and honest. In fact, showing your hand is important to some degree, as it helps you be better understood, be better heard, and creates an opportunity for better solutions. At the same time, disclosure is within participants control and no one is forced to share information they wish to keep private.

Myth: There is no point in mediating because I already know Im right.

Reality: You can feel justified in your actions and beliefs and still have a problem, because the other person usually feels theyre right too. And, since mediation isnt about determining who is right or wrong, you have the opportunity to save time, energy and money by focusing instead on how to solve the problem and move on with your life.

Myth: If we cant talk to one another, its impossible to be in mediation together.

Reality: When were in conflict with someone, it is true that our ability to communicate effectively is reducedsometimes substantially. Mediators are trained professionals who know how to help people talk in order to work out the differences, even when the gap is wide and difficult. So, its not unusual to have mediations where two or more of the participants havent spoken with each other in some time or have been speaking, but ineffectively. And while most mediation in this country takes place with everyone in the same room, if participants truly cannot share space safely and effectively, it is always possible to mediate between participants in separate rooms...or even in different countries, in this new age of online dispute resolution.

Copyright 2004 and 2006 by Tammy Lenski. All rights reserved.

Get your complimentary copy of target="_new" "http://talkingitoutin10.com/ Talking It Out in Ten, a where to donate a car and guide to help you think and prepare for your difficult conversations at work and home.

target="_new" "http://lenski.com/media-room/ Dr. Tammy Lenski is a dialogue jump-starter, an expert at helping people talk out their differences and build stronger work and home relationships in the process. Tammy has helped individuals, work teams and entire organizations make their peace with conflict for almost two decades. Known for approaching sticky situations with an educators heart, professional mediators skill, and a creatives instinct, she taps her background as an organizational leader, college professor, executive coach and mediator to serve clients who dont just want to settle conflict but use it to transform their organization or themselves.

Tammy writes extensively about impotence conflict, coaching, and resolution at "http://lenski.com/ Lenski.com, where you can find over 400 articles to jump-start your own dialogues.